|
page no. 1 2 3 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Ulrike,
Thank you for asking me to write a few comments about my experience in the Feminist
Art Program at California Institute of the Arts in 1973-1974. We were the first group
of women artists to study art at an accredited art school in history. Miriam Schapiro
made sure that the Smithsonian Historical Records in Washington D.C. noted this new
phenomenon in art education. I am always proud of that fact. |
|
My
experiences at that early part of my professional art instruction created a bottomline
awareness that a woman artist was as important as a man artist.
Studying the writings of early feminist writers, art historians
and artists backed up the premise of the importance of the androgynous ideal in art.
There was not too much discussion about the sexuality, at the time, about lesbians
versus straight, or Marxism. Feminism was truly an emergence of an androgynous perspective.
The goal was to create strength within the woman as an artist and person, not as
a political animal. Not to create female art, but mainstream art. This was my final
assumption. |
|
I
decided to leave the program as there was a little to much emphasis placed on group
projects and complications. One book was enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
page no. 1 2 3 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
I learned I could lead the
group and help steer important decisions in order for the book, "Anonymous Was
A Woman" to be laid out and readable. I stayed up for 48 hours restructuring
the final layout to the doubts of some of my colleagues in the program. I felt working
in a group was not for me. Over time, I also began to notice that my fellow feminists
who were of the same age or slightly older, maybe a year or two, felt like my comrades.
The women who were between 5-10 years older than us on the contrary, were still not
able to give that kinship and support needed in the real world. This was another
reason I left, because I could see this generational difference, to this day, it
still exists.
Feminist art at CalArts, was adamantly opposed to creating
vaginal art, or art that only associated to a female reality. In fact Miriam Schapiro
and Judy Chicago had had some split up or power struggle which had something to do
with this. Mimi didn't want to talk about it. Discipline and professionalism was
always her credo and the need to work, work, and express yourself true. When Judy
Chicago started the Last Supper project in Venice, we at CalArts of the feminist
art program were disgusted to discover that Ms. Chicago did not pay her women workers
even a minimum wage for their devoted assistance. We thought she was leading a cult. |
|
|
|
|
|
page no. 1 2 3 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
A younger artist recently
said to me how great she thought the Last Supper was because it was created by all
women. I still maintain that it is important to pay your woman assistants money,
as Lynda Benglis did when I collaborated with her during that time. The final blow
came when Lynda Benglis came out with the Dildo Ad in Art Forum which touched on
the joke that art was not about sexuality, sexuality was about advertising! Mimi
Schapiro and other feminists deeply criticized Benglis for doing such a controversial
act We, the younger women supported her to the end.
We had consciousness raising groups by night and shared our
deepest darkest secrets, our anger against patriarchal fathers or brothers, or even
mothers who never developed. The greatest moment for me was when I brought my mother
to a meeting of our feminist literature class taught by Sherry Brody. The discussion
was built around how great woman writers were able to assert themselves into their
work even while they still raised families. The few that did gave themselves the
permission to develop themselves, their art, and help the people around them evenly.
After that discussion, my mother went back to college and is now a practicing MFCC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|